Saturday, May 23, 2020

America s Free Trade Agreement - 1614 Words

Most people from Mexico, just like in Veracruz, lived a simple life. Their means of income was through farming, so obviously this was their bread and butter, but not until when NAFTA, the North America Free Trade Agreement, was implemented between the United States, Mexico, and Canada (The Other Side of Immigration). Urrea states â€Å"you’d think that at least there would be beans to eat, but the great Mexican bean-growing industrial farms sold much of their crop to the United States† (45). Since then, most Mexicans, especially those people from Veracruz, was affected. Even though the primary reason for this agreement was to eliminate trade and investment barriers between Canada, U.S., and Mexico to make produce less expensive, this brought a†¦show more content†¦Although the agricultural sector of Mexico was affected by NAFTA, the country has another source of income to keep their economy running gasoline and oil, tourism, and the remittance that is being sen t through Western Union by families, who earn money in the United States, to their loved ones in Mexico. It was documented in 2008 that there were $25 billion that was sent back to Mexico (The Other Side of Immigration), but even though the country [Mexico] earns through oil, tourism, and remittance, it was still not helpful for the Welton 26 and most Mexicans who migrated illegally to have job opportunities. That is why many Mexicans like the Welton 26 illegally migrated to the United States for better opportunities and to earn more money to provide for the ones they left behind. Another sad truth why the Welton 26 and most Mexicans chose to migrate illegally here in the United States was because the economy of Mexico is in a dilapidated situation because of the corruption of their government officials. Most Mexicans would say that they are suffering because they are neglected by their politicians no matter how hard they work (The Other Side of Immigration). Urrea shares, â€Å"and in the economy of hunger, which the fat men of the governments did not understand, more mouths meant more

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.